J_JTC_2016A 02/12/2016 Committee Summary
Final
STAFF SUMMARY OF MEETING
COMMITTEE ON JOINT TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE
Date: | 02/12/2016 |
ATTENDANCE
|
|
Time: | 01:31 PM to 02:09 PM |
Newell
|
X
|
Singer
|
*
|
||
Place: | HCR 0112 |
Tate
|
X
|
Thurlow
|
X
|
||
This Meeting was called to order by |
Martinez Humenik
|
X
|
|
Representative Tyler |
Tyler
|
X
|
|
This Report was prepared by | |||
Katie Ruedebusch | |||
X = Present, E = Excused, A = Absent, * = Present after roll call
|
Bills Addressed: | Action Taken: | ||
FY 2016-17 Recommendations Regarding IT Budget Requests Discussion of Potential Legislation |
Recommendation(s) Approved Witness Testimony and/or Committee Discussion Only |
Representative Tyler, chair, called the meeting to order. A quorum was present.
01:31 PM -- FY 2016-17 Recommendations Regarding IT Budget Requests
The committee received a copy of the FY 2016-17 IT capital budget request recommendation letter from the Joint Technology Committee (JTC) to the Joint Budget Committee (JBC) (Attachment A).
160212 AttachA.pdf
BILL: | FY 2016-17 Recommendations Regarding IT Budget Requests | |
TIME: | 01:32:35 PM | |
MOVED: | Tate | |
MOTION: | Approve the JTC FY 2016-17 IT capital budget request recommendation letter to the JBC (Attachment A). The motion passed on a vote of 6-0. | |
SECONDED: | ||
VOTE
|
||
Newell
|
Yes
|
|
Singer
|
Yes
|
|
Tate
|
Yes
|
|
Thurlow
|
Yes
|
|
Martinez Humenik
|
Yes
|
|
Tyler
|
Yes
|
|
Final YES: 6 NO: 0 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: PASS
|
01:35 PM -- Discussion of Potential Legislation
Representative Tyler discussed whether the committee would like to move forward with potential draft legislation. He stated that most of the issues addressed by the potential legislation can be addressed or resolved in other ways.
Ms. Jessika Shipley, Legislative Council Staff, came to the table to discuss whether the committee would like to see additional IT budget operating requests and operating requests that are associated with prior approved IT capital requests.
Mr. Michael Shea, representing the Governor's Office of Information Technology (OIT), came to the table to answer committee questions regarding procurement and reporting.
The committee discussed whether it would like to be kept informed of IT projects previously approved by the committee. Committee members highlighted information received through the five-year plans and dashboards submitted by OIT. Committee members also discussed cash-fund project approval and ethical IT procurement practices.
Ms. Shipley returned to the table to note that state agencies need spending authority for cash-funded IT capital projects from the committee. She also discussed requirements for higher education cash-funded projects.
02:00 PM
The committee discussed possible dates for future meetings.
02:09 PM
The committee adjourned.