CLICS/CLICS2020A/commsumm.nsf
PUBLIC
BILL SUMMARY For HB20-1146
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON RURAL AFFAIRS & AGRICULTURE
Date Feb 10, 2020
Location LSB A
HB20-1146 - Postponed Indefinitely
|
|
|
01:32:41 PM |
Minority Leader Neville, prime sponsor, presented House Bill 20-1146 to the committee. The bill modifies the process for donating a conservation easement and requires the creation of a publically accessible map and database of conservation easements. Representative Neville responded to committee questions.
|
|
01:48:24 PM |
Jillane Hixson, representing herself, testified
remotely from Lamar, in support of the bill. Belinda Groner, representing
herself, testified remotely from Lamar, in support of the bill. Ms.
Hixson and Ms. Groner responded to committee questions.
|
|
02:04:47 PM |
Jim Guire, representing himself, testified remotely from Grand Junction, in support of the bill and responded to committee questions.
|
|
02:12:29 PM |
Erik Glenn, representing the HB 1264 working group, testified in opposition to the bill. Melissa Daruna, representing Keep it Colorado, testified in opposition to the bill. Alan Gentz, representing the HB 1264 working group, testified on the bill. The panel responded to committee questions.
|
|
02:36:09 PM |
Mack Louden, representing himself, testified in support of the bill. Emily Ibach, representing the Colorado Farm Bureau, testified in opposition to the bill. The panel responded to committee questions.
|
|
02:41:30 PM |
Minority Leader Neville made final remarks on the bill. Committee members commented on the bill.
|
02:52:09 PM
|
Motion |
Refer House Bill 20-1146 to the Committee on Finance. |
|
| Moved |
Neville |
|
| Seconded |
Valdez D. |
|
|
|
|
|
Arndt |
No |
|
|
Buentello |
No |
|
|
Catlin |
Yes |
|
|
Holtorf |
Yes |
|
|
Neville |
Yes |
|
|
Pelton |
Yes |
|
|
Titone |
No |
|
|
Woodrow |
No |
|
|
Young |
No |
|
|
Valdez D. |
No |
|
|
Roberts |
No |
|
|
|
YES: 4 NO: 7 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: FAIL |
|
|
02:52:55 PM
|
Motion |
Postpone House Bill 20-1146 indefinitely using a reversal of the previous roll call. There was no objection to the use of the reverse roll call, therefore, the bill was postponed indefinitely. |
|
| Moved |
Valdez D. |
|
| Seconded |
Roberts |
|
|
|
|
|
Arndt |
Yes |
|
|
Buentello |
Yes |
|
|
Catlin |
No |
|
|
Holtorf |
No |
|
|
Neville |
No |
|
|
Pelton |
No |
|
|
Titone |
Yes |
|
|
Woodrow |
Yes |
|
|
Young |
Yes |
|
|
Valdez D. |
Yes |
|
|
Roberts |
Yes |
|
|
Final |
YES: 7 NO: 4 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: PASS |
|
|
